Three years ago, Crinum pedunculatum was inactivated and swapped to C. asiaticum pedunculatum as per POWO (https://powo.science.kew.org/results?q=crinum%20pedunculatum). However, all Australian authorities recognise C. pedunculatum as the valid name. The major issue with iNat having it as a variety of C. asiaticum is that this species is also present in Australia (Xmas Island, Cocos Islands), and so the records on iNat ID'ed as the variety are getting mapped to C. asiaticum and thus mispresenting its apparent range. I have therefore swapped it back and logged a deviation.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.