New taxon change

Taxonomic Changes

Change types
Clear filters

Taxonomic Swap 100402 (Committed on 2021-10-18)

World Spider Catalog (Citation)
Added by zdanko on October 18, 2021 13:04 | Committed by zdanko on October 18, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100401 (Committed on 2021-10-18)

Cooperative Catalogue of Palaearctic ... (Citation)
Added by bagous on October 18, 2021 08:53 | Committed by bagous on October 18, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100400 (Draft)

POWO (Citation)
Added by kevinfaccenda on October 18, 2021 03:45
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100399 (Draft)

Added by kitty12 on October 18, 2021 02:17
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100398 (Draft)

Added by kitty12 on October 18, 2021 01:04
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100397 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

correct orthography as per POWO; correction sent to IPNI

unknown
Added by choess on October 17, 2021 23:22 | Committed by choess on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100396 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

printed error for "tylodes"

unknown
Added by choess on October 17, 2021 22:38 | Committed by choess on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100395 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Oliveira et al., 2021 synonymized Cephalotes marginatus under C. atratus

A taxonomic study of the Brazilian tu... (Citation)
Added by mettcollsuss on October 17, 2021 21:55 | Committed by mettcollsuss on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100394 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

POWO (Citation)
Added by dryopteris2 on October 17, 2021 20:20 | Committed by dryopteris2 on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Split 100393 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

POWO (Citation)
Added by dryopteris2 on October 17, 2021 19:32 | Committed by dryopteris2 on October 17, 2021
split into

Taxonomic Swap 100392 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:38 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100391 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:36 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Split 100390 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

There are two Polypodium riograndense homonyms and we have supposed observations for both.

unknown
Added by choess on October 17, 2021 17:31 | Committed by choess on October 17, 2021
split into

Taxonomic Swap 100389 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

unknown
Yes
Added by vitalfranz on October 17, 2021 17:28 | Committed by vitalfranz on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100388 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:24 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100387 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:23 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100386 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:21 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100385 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:21 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100384 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:20 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100383 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:19 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100382 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:18 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100381 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:17 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100380 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:16 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100379 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:15 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100378 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:14 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100377 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:13 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100376 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:12 | Committed by borisb on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100375 (Draft)

Gender of genus is treated neuter in most relevant sources, but as feminine in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799738/
(and there discussed, why).
Got adopted by Tenebrionidae taxonomists recently.

unknown
Yes
Added by borisb on October 17, 2021 17:11
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100374 (Committed on 2021-10-17)

unknown
Added by ampullinidae on October 17, 2021 16:47 | Committed by ampullinidae on October 17, 2021
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 100373 (Draft)

POWO (Citation)
Added by epsilon on October 17, 2021 12:29
replaced with