@cooperj@aldendirks I have set this one up, again with the atlasing about as good as I can manage based on the limited data available to us. If there are more sources to use for this, please send them my way. Couldn't find anything on Asia, so I lumped them all into pinicola s.s. @alan_rockefeller if you have data that might be helpful in this, that would be appreciated, too. I know the sampling in California in that paper was relatively poor, especially with so many observations on iNat.
For the observations outside of the atlased zones, they should only be kicked up to the Fomitopsis pinicola complex (which I made recently), so not all the way to genus. That should still be pretty manageable.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
@cooperj @aldendirks I have set this one up, again with the atlasing about as good as I can manage based on the limited data available to us. If there are more sources to use for this, please send them my way. Couldn't find anything on Asia, so I lumped them all into pinicola s.s. @alan_rockefeller if you have data that might be helpful in this, that would be appreciated, too. I know the sampling in California in that paper was relatively poor, especially with so many observations on iNat.
For the observations outside of the atlased zones, they should only be kicked up to the Fomitopsis pinicola complex (which I made recently), so not all the way to genus. That should still be pretty manageable.