Previous swap was based on the argument that the epithet strigosus for this species has priority over lecomtei. It does, and that bears on the correct name within Lentinus, but it's a moot point in Panus, where those aren't the competing epithets. In Panus, the epithet strigosus is unavailable, we have to use neostrigosus, and its priority only dates to 2012. It doesn't get priority from its replaced synonym strigosus (1825). The two competing names are P. neostrigosus and P. lecomtei; the latter epithet wins with 187 years of priority.
unknown
Added by pulk on 04 June, 2024 06:21
|
Committed by pulk on 03 June, 2024
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.