The Empty Pampas: epitome of a biogeographical mystery, part 2

...continued from https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/milewski/55189-the-empty-pampas-epitome-of-a-biogeographical-mystery-part-1#

Everyone knows that

  • the megafauna which disappeared from the Americas about ten thousand years ago included the relatives of elephants, camels and zebras;
  • a particular feature was an array of extremely large relatives of sloths and armadillos; and
  • the most outlandish of the carnivores were sabre-tooth felids and short-faced bears resembling gigantic hyenas.

However, what is less well-known is that, in most respects, Buenos Aires Province is even more deserving of the 'mega-' than the La Brea tar pits of California. On a prey-base of diverse large mammals of both modern and archaic (e.g. see https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Juan-D-Carrillo/publication/324364169_Systematics_of_the_South_American_Native_Ungulates_and_the_Neogene_Evolution_of_Mammals_from_Northern_South_America/links/5b76d884299bf119f6532b78/Systematics-of-the-South-American-Native-Ungulates-and-the-Neogene-Evolution-of-Mammals-from-Northern-South-America.pdf and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litopterna) lineages, South America supported the largest felid ever recorded (Smilodon populator, https://prehistoric-fauna.com/Smilodon-populator) in addition to a true lion (see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631068317301094).

The capacity of the pampas to support a megafauna outdoing, in some sense, even that of Pleistocene Africa is possibly owing to the extreme nutrient-richness of a coastal plain which at the time reached even farther out on the coastal shelf than it does today (see https://culturalandscape.wordpress.com/2012/11/19/ice-sheets-world-map/). This fertility is owing to the unusual genesis of the soils: repeated dustings of volcanic ash brought on the wind from the southernmost Andes, thousands of kilometers distant, for millions of years (see https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325475166_Soils_of_the_Pampean_Region).

Despite the megafaunal extinction, there remained in South America several genera of ungulates (Ozotoceros, Blastocerus, Hippocamelus, Mazama, Llama, Vicugna, Pecari), plus several genera of rodents (Dolichotis https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Photo-of-a-mara-Dolichotis-patagonum-with-some-adaptations-for-running-being-highlighted_fig3_333504431, Hydrochoerus) with a potential for functional replacement of ungulates.

Body size is one of the most adaptable features of mammals, making it easy to imagine compensation in the pampas within a few thousand years in response to the new opportunities for niche-expansion.

Even if just the guanaco (Llama guanicoe, https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/1126732/view/guanaco-grazing-on-grassland-plain-patagonia-chile), plus a long-legged derivative of the capybara, plus one species of deer exceeding 100 kg, had all obeyed the axiom 'nature abhors a vacuum' with enhanced gregariousness, the Empty Pampas would have been restored to a plain full of movement.

But this did not happen, and even the pampas deer - a weakly gregarious 'token' of plains game - remained less than half the body mass of the closely related mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus, https://pxhere.com/en/photo/1385001) of North American grassland.

To be continued in https://www.inaturalist.org/posts/55195-the-empty-pampas-epitome-of-a-biogeographical-mystery-part-3#...

Posted on 12 August, 2021 05:38 by milewski milewski

Comments

The extinct deer of the late Pleistocene in Buenos Aires Province were Epieuryceros proximus ('very large'), Antifer ultra, and Morenoelaphus lujanensis (see https://www.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/catedras/proteccion/tp3/Neotropical01.pdf).

Posted by milewski over 2 years ago

Are there geographical barriers to the migration of larger mammals into the Pampas area? In the other sections you mention the resilience of the indigenous population in repelling Europeans - could that be an indication of an anthropological barrier as well - the population of the Pampas could have been just as interested in keeping larger mammals - particularly predators - out of an area where the remaining food species were essentially the easiest food source for humans on the entire planet?

If I had to choose between a lifelong and generational diet of cow (domesticated), beaver (wild), or moose (wild) I would choose beaver. In every way a population of wild beaver would be easier to work with, rely on, and harvest than a population of moose or cows. I would also have a vested interest in keeping out anything - human or animal - which would interfere with my food security.

Posted by marshall20 over 2 years ago

@marshall20 Many thanks for these thoughts...

Posted by milewski over 2 years ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments