Distribution of Colour Forms in Volucella bombylans

In iNaturalist we are able to identify the named colour forms of Volucella bombylans.

I have tried to add these to as many V bomblylans observations as possible to see if anything interesting emerges. Because a great many of these observations are not yet Research Grade at the level of 'form' the data below are taken for searches including any ID of that form using the "ident_taxon_id =" URL.

The forms are:
f. bombylans - all black haired but for a red haired tail.
f. plumata - yellow haired around the sides and back of the scutum, and the base of the abdomen, with a white tail.
f. haemorrhoidalis - as plumata but with a red tail.
There are other rare forms that are unnamed.

Conventional wisdom is that f. plumata is the most common form with about 2/3 prevalence, f. bombylans constitutes almost all the rest. This is borne out in iNat data: of 1387 observations 883 are f. plumata (64%), 451 f. bombylans (33%) and just 53 f. haemorrhoidalis (4%).

However they do not appear to be evenly distributed. I haven't looked for any research on this, so it's perhaps likely things are already known, but I thought I'd put them out there anyway.

f. plumata



.
.
.
f. bombylans



.
.
.
f. haemorrhoidalis


According to the iNat data, it would seem that f bombylans is quite restricted to the area between the Pyrenees (or really central France) and the Urals.

There are no f. bombylans observations in Asia, compared to 21 f. plumata and 1 f. haemorroidalis (one would have expected about 7).

There is only one f. bomblyans observation southwest of a diagonal line across France from St Malo to St Tropez - that is on the West coast of France. None at all in Iberia - again one would have expected about 6 or 7 from 19 Iberian observations.

The other interesting thing about Iberia is the overrepresentation of f haemorrhoidalis. The Iberian observations break down as 12 f. plumata and 7 f. haemorrhoidalis, that is very similar to the 2:1 ratio normally observed between f. plumata and f. bomblyans, as if f. haemorrhoidalis somehow replaces f. bombylans in Iberia.

There are also no f. bombylans in Scotland, out of 25 observations.

The numbers are fairly small and I've done no statistical analysis of the significance of this, but it certainly seems quite interesting.

Posted by matthewvosper matthewvosper, 27 June, 2022 13:58

Comments

@phycus @szucsich @flo-dycob @gerrit_oehm @kostaszontanos I don't know if this is obvious and well known or what, but I found it interesting to have a look.

Posted by matthewvosper 5 months ago (Flag)

Very interesting! Thanks for sharing.

Posted by kostaszontanos 5 months ago (Flag)

interesting! I was always fascinated with the color morphs back in the days.. I wonder if the color morphs have something to do with the black/red Bombus species. And indeed, most of them are more rare in the southern France and Spain, a bit more common in the Pyrenees. but this was just a quick glance.... BTW the links in this page were not working when I tried opening them...

Posted by phycus 5 months ago (Flag)

@phycus there aren't any links in this page :) Can you see the maps though?

Posted by matthewvosper 5 months ago (Flag)

Interestingly, the range map of Bombus lapidarius does not have the same boundaries as V.b.bombylans

Posted by matthewvosper 5 months ago (Flag)

No I can't see the maps (might be our firewall, not sure). It is not the same distribution as lapidarius, but it is clear that the black and red Bombus are more rare in the south... Just an idea...

Posted by phycus 5 months ago (Flag)

Ah interesting. I see them on Microsoft Edge, but not on Google Chrome, so I suspect it's a browser thing. (Funnily enough I normally use Chrome, but I did this on Edge)

Posted by matthewvosper 5 months ago (Flag)

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments