Same as said on the reactivation of taxon #883401. Many articles corroborate Heraclides as genus and databases like Butterflies of America and SibBR already use and recognize it since 2017.
Illustrated Lists of American Butterflies (North and South America) 21-XI-2017 A. D. Warren, K. J. Davis, E. M. Stangeland, J. P. Pelham, K. R. Willmott & N. V. Grishin, Online Database (Link)
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
That was not at all clear until I saw that a subgenus had been sunk into a genus of the same name. I was wondering, "It was swapped for itself?"