Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Desarmillaria. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Desarmillaria tabescens 895035


Seems legit, by both mating and phylogenetic definitions. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00275514.2021.1890969?journalCode=umyc20

Posted by brantleesr over 2 years ago

Yup, that is the article cited above. Waiting for the name to get released on MycoBank.

Posted by jameskm over 2 years ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments