Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Lepomis megalotis. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Lepomis megalotis 58635
Update your content

Taxonomic Split 143684 (Committed on 29-08-2024)

Solis and aquilensis were recently accepted by Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes and added to iNat. These two species had been previously IDd as being megalotis. With them being added as species megalotis should be split.

Main source used by Eschmeyer's for elevating the species was Kim et al. 2022, and should as be a guide to the atlases for the split.

ESCHMEYER'S CATALOG OF FISHES: GENERA... (Citation)
Added by riverrat09 on 01 June, 2024 16:20 | Committed by operculum_ben on 29 August, 2024
split into

Comments

This split is currently just a draft and should not yet be committed!

Posted by riverrat09 4 months ago

Can we hit the red button?

Posted by operculum_ben about 2 months ago

I think it should be good to go.
There are some areas along the range boundaries where it is difficult to atlas as well as some areas where we just don't have good information on which species it should be, so hopefully it is not too destructive in those areas. Worst case scenario though it is either going to keep the ID it already is or will bump it to complex.

Posted by riverrat09 about 2 months ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments
 
Member of the iNaturalist Network   |   Powered by iNaturalist open source software |   Documentation for developers