Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
Roalson et al. (2015; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279852219_A_revision_of_generic_boundaries_and_nomenclature_in_the_North_American_cleomoid_clade_Cleomaceae) raise Wislizenia refracta subsp. californica and Wislizenia refracta subsp. palmeri to species status (as Cleomella californica and Cleomella palmeri) in addition to moving Wislizenia refracta to Cleomella refracta. The treatment of Roalson et al. (2015) recognizes the same taxa as the current Jepson eFlora treatment (https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=48570), although under different names & ranks.
For a while, POWO had Wislizenia refracta moved to Cleome refracta, apparently an error. I sent an email, and the error's been corrected.